中部高教研究

为了解2020年教育部《关于破除高校哲学社会科学研究评价中“唯论文”不良导向的若干意见》印发以来在高校的实施情况，采用问卷调查法，对2021年以来高校改革进展情况进行了调查。结果显示，当前政策执行中存在三大突出问题：“以刊评文”“以刊代评”占比过高，“绩效认定与论文收录、引用挂钩”和“论文收录作为教师评聘、人才引进依据情况”占比过高，分类评价和多元评价工作进展不均衡。基于史密斯模型的分析表明，问题的成因源于理想化政策设计、执行机构能力、目标群体响应和制度环境四个方面因素交织作用。对此提出如下建议：政策发布部门应提升政策编制的科学性，建立健全多部门统筹协调联动推进机制；高校应提高政治站位，勇担执行机构主体责任，强化落实机制，营造健康的学术生态。

To understand the implementation of the “Several Opinions on Eliminating the Negative Orientation of ‘Publication-Only' Evaluation in Philosophy and Social Science Research in Universities” issued by the Ministry of Education in 2020, a questionnaire survey was conducted to investigate the progress of the reform in universities since 2021. The results reveal three major issues in the implementation of this policy: an over-reliance on journalbased evaluation and journal rankings; performance appraisal and academic appointments still heavily tied to paper indexing and citation metrics; and an uneven progress in categorized evaluation and multivariate assessment. Based on the Smith Model analysis, the comprehensive causes lie in the interplay of four factors: idealized policy design, limited capacity of implementing institutions, varied responses from target groups, and constraints embedded in the institutional environment. Accordingly, recommendations are proposed for both policy-issuing authorities and universities: policy-issuing authorities should enhance the scientific nature of policy formulation and establish a coordinated multi-departmental promotion mechanism; universities should enhance political awareness of the reform, take proactive responsibility as implementing institutions, strengthen implementation mechanisms, and foster a healthy academic ecology.